Talk:Junkers J 1

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

removed: Ente is not known to have ever flown

as the german wikipedia entry "Robert_Gsell" reports flights. Haarspalter (talk) 08:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burt ruatn para removed

The para asserting that Burt Rutan was a pioneer of Glass-fibre composite aircraft construction was and I removed it. Glass-fibre composites had been in use for aircraft construction for over twenty years before Burt Rutan even mixed his first resin batch.Petebutt (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, that was not the gist of the passage, reread it to see that what was being described is the comparison of two landmark designers. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 07:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Complete...nonsense...when Burt Rutan became the second innovator in airframe material technology (1970s) with his composite construction concepts for complete airframes? Think about it a bit, please! His name SHOULD be mentioned here, as Hugo Junkers was the first innovator in airframe material technology in 1915, going from the "tall-ship" era wood and fabric from the Wright Brothers, to all-metal airframes. The PIPE (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CE

Tidied prose, added citations, auto-edded, dupe-WL search; still ploughing through books for citations. Keith-264 (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative?

Aircraft designers before the war were "conservative"? Because they hadn't fully revolutionized the technology that has just appeared a decade before that? Isn't that like calling computer makers conservative because they hadn't come up with a silicon chip by the time ten years had passed? Idumea47b (talk) 13:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]