Talk:Kate Gordon (psychologist)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Wisconsin

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles

Psychology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Good work!

This looks well organized and very professional. I really like the organization of the article so far and look forward to seeing your progress! Harg6896 (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Good luck on your article. I'll try to get the chance to check yours out if I can and provide some possible suggestions that would hopefully help you out. TreyDumler (talk) 16:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback (again)

Hey Trey! It looks like the article talk page to which I posted my peer review was deleted, so I figured that I would post again here to make sure that I get credit. I am glad that you took my advice in combining the career/work sections and adding a section for publications. I also think that there is a lot less repetition between your lead and career sections. I hope that I have helped you improve your article! I do have one final suggestion: perhaps you could add links to some of her publications (if links are available), in case a reader wants to learn more about a particular subject. I think the article looks really solid now, keep up the good work! David Potts (talk) 20:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I was trying to look for your feedback the other day and couldn't find it. Your suggestions were very helpful and I completely agree that what you had said made the article solid. I do intend to add links to her publications as this would help the audience find additional resources easier. Thanks again! TreyDumler (talk) 16:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Kate Gordon

Jasonmonroe417 (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC) --Intro, 3rd sentence, should either read "Specifically, she published A work" or "published works" --Intro, second paragraph "...Feb 18, 1878" (comma after day not month) --Next sentence "...with both her father and brother being" would read better, I think. --"...from 1904 until 1948 when she was made a professor..." would read better than two sentences --Career section "The Psychology of Meaning" should be italicized or quotation marks I think.[reply]

Great job and you have made a very nice contribution here with lots of material.Jasonmonroe417 (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions and I corrected everything. TreyDumler (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]