Talk:Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts

Kansas City High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Missouri High‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Copyediting

As I tagged the article with {{advert}} and {{copyedit}} I'm responding to a request for more detailed suggestions. The opening paragraph focuses on the size and cost of the venue, which if they are not extraordinary are of temporary interest only. The size might fit with either the facilities section or the architecture section; the cost might fit with the history, or perhaps a new background/origin section explaining why it was built. The facilities section is OK, the resident companies is OK, except for "troops/troupes" homonym. (This is the only real copyediting issue I see on review now.) The architecture section sounds suspiciously like a cut-and-paste from a brochure or project proposal and that should be checked out; if it comes from a reliable source (such as an architecture critic) it should be cited. The list of firms is directory-like and promotional. The organization section is a collection of vanity redlinks (are any of these people WP:BIO-level notable, or just local luminaries?), and suggests that the facility is named for someone associated with the board, but doesn't explain why (back to origin section). Finally, there are no cited sources providing independent verification of the importance of the subject. I think I will change {{copyedit}} to {{primary sources}} to make clearer what is missing. --Dhartung | Talk 04:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done.65.28.9.8 02:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]