Talk:King's Quest VI

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Radio Stations and Lawsuits

I was just wondering what the deal was with the radio stations threatening to sue Sierra over the Girl in the Tower song... That is not very well explained or referenced. GBMorris 01:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits section

Is it really neccessary to include all this much detail in the credits section? Besides for the complete King's Quest nut I would say this info is largely irrelevant. Perhaps only the main contributors (writers, producers, directors and programmers) should be mentioned. Zunaid 10:21, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In fact, none of the other King's Quest game articles have credit sections. Movie articles on Wikipedia mention the director and stars, and perhaps, rarely, the screenwriter. It's generally assumed that if you want to know who the gaffer or cinematographer was on a particular film, you go to IMDB. The same sort of idea should be assumed of games. I'm incorporating the designers and writers into the header of the article, I don't think anyone will mind. MasterGrazzt 19:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I just re-added the entry without knowing there was a discussion--sorry about that. But let me just say, many people interested in videogames are interested in more than just the game designer or executive producer, especially for games that come from back in the day when there were very small development teams. The credits information also provides interesting background for the game. The individual credited with the voice of Graham, for example, is a game developer in his own right. And the voice of Alexander was a famous voice actor named Robby Benson. This additional background on the game would go unnoticed without a credits section. In closing, I just think people who are really interested in videogames care about not only the content of the game, but also what happens behind the scenes of the game. The credits section is a factual way of satisfying the second need, of having a peek behind the curtain. Xquester --GBMorris 01:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Complete Redo

The plot section is VASTLY inadequate, it's written poorly ("Can he solve the mystery and bring peace to the kingdom?") and doesn't feature the dual branch (even if it is in the gameplay section, it doesn't elaborate on it there) Could someone put a revision banner up? Oakpack4 (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the article

I'd like to adress some of the problems with this article. Would anyone like to help me improve it? --Mors Martell (talk) 19:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:King's Quest: Quest for the Crown which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

title

Just a question, I thought that the title of the game was rederring to Cassima, not Alexander. I thought it was saying the she is the heir to the throne now, but will be dead soon, so, therefore, "Heir today, gone tomorrow", refers to her. Should that part of the article be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irrewonderful (talk • contribs) 16:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Quest VI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121125093048/http://www.sierraplanet.com/curiosities/kingsquest/collections.html to http://sierraplanet.com/curiosities/kingsquest/collections.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source