Jump to content

Talk:Klaipėda Castle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As per Gdansk vote, the correct name would be Memel Castle. We have Königsberg Castle rather than Kaliningrad Castle. --Ghirla-трёп- 12:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But we have Malbork Castle, etc. In other hand, Memelburg should be instead of Memel Castle. Knowing complexity of this issue, before making this article I investigated name usage, currently established museum uses (in EN) Klaipėda Castle as well as museum publications do so. So I decided to go with museum preferred name. I also would like to know what thinks other editors, before making any moves. M.K. 14:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

[edit]
  • 25 English pages for "memelburg castle" -wikipedia
  • 11 English pages for "memel castle" -wikipedia
  • 133 English pages for "klaipeda castle" -wikipedia

These results are affected by the popularity of the Klaipeda Castle Jazz Festival.

One consideration is the usage of Klaipeda Castle by the European Network of National Heritage Organisations [1]. This multinational org works with the European Commission. Novickas 18:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the Gdansk vote determined, we should not be duped by google search results, which only reflect Lithuanization policies of the official administration. The castle was not built by the Lithuanians. Actually, it was never administrated by Lithuania. --Ghirla-трёп- 18:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Í agree with Ghirla, Memel Castle should be the name of the article. Other variations, such as the Lithuanian and possibly the German naming, may be observed in the intro. --Camptown 22:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was this ever resolved? I think its weird that the name is Klaipeda Castle given the history, and aforementioned points--Simen113 (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gdansk vote

[edit]

I believe Talk:Gdansk/Vote should apply here. Here is the template. -- Petri Krohn 07:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klaipėda Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Klaipėda Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]