Talk:Lahmiales

Fungi: Lichens Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lahmiales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090318003134/http://www.fieldmuseum.org/myconet/outline.asp to http://archive.fieldmuseum.org/myconet/outline.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Lahmiales be renamed and moved to Lahmia.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Lahmiales → Lahmia – There's no WP:MONOTYPICTAXA guideline for fungi, but I think WP:CONCISE is enough of a reason to move from the order title "Lahmiales" to the genus title "Lahmia". Also, the genus was described in 1861, while the order was constructed over a century later in 1986 (with its name derived from the genus). jlwoodwa (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Also would be WP:CONSISTENT with other ToL articles. I think I'd have just moved this per WP:JUSTDOIT. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]