Talk:Lambert Barnard

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Who has suggested that Barnard is the creator of "Troy book, et. al"?

The sentence in "other works" should probably be removed. It reads:

There is nothing in his style to indicate, as has been suggested,that he was the author of eight of the miniatures of John Lydgates' Troy Book and Siege of Troy, British Library Royal MS 8 D I

This is relevant only if there is some level of discussion concerning Barnard's possible creation of these works. However, I could find no source that explains who has been suggesting he was the possible creator of the works. I'm not an art history major, so if this is a common contention, it should be cited.

However, without knowing who suggests Barnard was the artist, the sentence is really nothing more than a sentence declaring work that Barnard did NOT create. It does not seem relevant and I propose deletion of this sentence.