Talk:Lapse rate
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
inconsistent units
[edit]Why are the dry and saturated rates given in different units? The dry rate is given in degrees C/km and degrees F/1000ft, while the saturated rate is given in degrees C/1000 feet. Obviously, this makes it impossible to compare one rate to the other without doing some math on the reader’s part. 73.90.91.93 (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Equilibrium?
[edit]The adiabatic lapse rate section says it assumes "a still vertical column at equilibrium". Elsewhere I've read that at thermal equilibrium, the temperature is uniform even in a gravitational field. My intuition says gradient, since it seems to me the molecules should pick up speed as they fall. But I genuinely don't know the truth. Is there a reference for this? Would an isolated column of ideal gas in a gravitational field g have a temperature gradient proportional to g? Spiel496 (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The statement about “a still vertical column” was wrong, and has been amended. A new section “Lapse rate in an isolated column of gas” addresses the issue of the lapse rate in still air in a gravitational field with no energy flows through it. ~~~ Rhwentworth (talk) 05:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Low-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- C-Class Weather articles
- Mid-importance Weather articles
- C-Class Climate articles
- Mid-importance Climate articles
- WikiProject Weather articles