Talk:Lawsonella clevelandensis
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 28 October 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Lawsonella clevelandensis be renamed and moved to Lawsonella. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Lawsonella clevelandensis → Lawsonella – There's no WP:MONOTYPICTAXA guideline for bacteria, but I think WP:CONCISE is enough of a reason to move this article from the species name to the monotypic genus name. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Also would be WP:CONSISTENT with other ToL articles. YorkshireExpat (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)