Talk:Lev Chernyi/GA1

GA Review

"Related topics" should be "See also" per WP:SEEALSO
Add page numbers for the book references.

Gary King (talk) 01:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Greetings Gary, and thanks for undertaking to review the article.WP:SEEALSO explicitly contradicts your first point: "A less common practice is to name the section "Related topics". " I have provided page numbers for the books cited. Is the article acceptable now? Regards, Skomorokh 02:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No birth date? At least mention that it is disputed or unknown. Also, I've never seen a "Related topics" section in the past 3 years of editing, so it was based on assumption. Gary King (talk) 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found a reliable source that said it is disputed or unknown...would it not be original research to say so? Skomorokh 02:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I have added the article to the appropriate category. This article now meets the Good article criteria and has therefore been passed. Gary King (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, thank you for your attention and diligence Gary. Sincerely, Skomorokh 02:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]