Talk:Lex, Rex

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Modern philosophy

tr4ghy6

hi it is someone on the book .who are you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.70.44 (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Line 1 of intro: The English subtitle is actually 'The Law and the Prince', not 'The Law is King'. Dwlegg (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)dwlegg[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lex, Rex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917124348/http://www.tulip.org/Lex%20Rex.htm to http://www.tulip.org/Lex%20Rex.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]