Jump to content

Talk:List of U.S. Highways in Texas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USRD/STDS/L

[edit]

I've done the basic conversion to put the list on WP:USRD/STDS/L using the templates for that purpose. The termini need to added or updated (should be "X in/near/at Y" where X is a link [but no graphics!] for the intersecting highway[s] and Y is the appropriate location). Working with the termini will also shorten or eliminate a lot of the notes. The lengths should also be updated as necessary, and there are a couple of duplicates that need to be sorted out. Imzadi 1979  05:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And lest I forget, all of the business routes need to be added to the auxiliary table. People will also note that the 2dUSs and the 3dUSs are in the same table; well, there isn't the 2d vs. 3d distinction as with the Interstates; AASHTO considers the "auxiliary highways" for the United States Numbered Highway System to be the "bannered" ones. Imzadi 1979  05:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

2001:EE0:4141:268D:CCBF:B0E2:586B:F2C8 (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure what you want to say here because you didn't say anything. This list is quite far from a potential nomination to be a Featured List.
  1. There are no prose sections, and certainly no lead.
  2. The tables are incomplete. Many termini need to be filled in, lengths need to be added and there are some years that need citations yet.
Until those two things are done, this can't be nominated because it won't pass. Imzadi 1979  02:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split page up

[edit]

This page is getting too long and needs to be split. 2600:1700:6180:6290:60CB:CA76:257F:41DC (talk) 18:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The notes columns in the tables should be trimmed up better, certainly, but it's not really too long at this point that it needs a split. Imzadi 1979  21:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]