Talk:List of University of Manchester people

Text and/or other creative content from List of University of Manchester people was copied or moved into List of University of Manchester alumni. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Mark 1

Mark 1 was not the first modern computer but rather one of the first. Z3 was a few years earlier (see Zuse_Z3). Corrected this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.74.7 (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on your set of criteria of what a modern computer is, really. I studied CS at Manchester, and they were pretty insistent on the fact that the Manchester Baby was the first on account of the fact it could store data electronically. Of course they also taught us about Zuse, and I've always maintained that he had at least as good a case for claiming to be the first.

I've altered the entry slightly so as to explicitly say why the Baby and Mark 1 were so significant, rather than just that they were. -- Fursday 17:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Cox

I'm not sure whether Brian Cox should be mentioned in such a prominent list of physicists, I do not think he is of the same notoriety as the others on the list. 84.68.35.57 (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think if I was making a similar list for Warwick of Oxford I would include Ian Stewart, and Richard Dawkins as well known popularizers of science, and would put them under maths and biology respectively. So yes I would keep him here amongst this more august company. Billlion (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List? Or collection of mini-biographies?

Some of the entries here are becoming mini-biographical essays. But surely the place for such essay-like material is at the article of the subject, not in this list article. See some of the entries under some of the science subjects.

I propose pruning such essays in this article to restore its list-like characters: name and a couple of notable features.

This edit gives an example.

Thoughts?

Feline Hymnic (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]