Talk:List of current Cash Money Records artists
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
New addition[edit]
A few weeks ago they signed a new rapper from Orlando, Florida named Caskey. He needs to be added to the list. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YTVCMr3Rrg
That Youtube vid is the proof. Mage505 (talk) 02:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- As a general rule, youtube videos are not [{WP:RS|reliable sources]], that is also true. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:57, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Merge proposal[edit]
I propose that this article be merged with Cash Money Records, as the list of artists signed to the label is not very long, and would not change the size of the main page much. This would be in a table format in the Cash Money Records#Artists section. This extra page is pretty unnecessary, considering Cash Money Records is not a very big article in its own right. STATic message me! 01:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- I would oppose that, actually specifically for the last reason you say: if you add this list (and, of course, you'd also need to add List of former Cash Money Records artists) to that article, the actual text, which is as you say not very big, would be completely dwarfed. That is, I think these two lists would overwhelm the main article. I think the only way I could see it would be not a table but a 4 column list, if that would fit. Even that would worry me, but might be ok. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, the list of former artists could be linked under a "see also" section, as they are no longer relevant to the label, being former artists. Just having the current Cash Money Records roster would be proper, and is only around 20 something. This would not completely dwarf the rest of the article. A two or three column list would do that just fine. STATic message me! 02:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, I guess I wouldn't mind that. If no one else objects, feel free to make the move and redirect. BTW, as you probably saw, I just redirected the List of Cash Money Records artists. No matter what, we definitely can't have a "artists", "current artists", and "former artists" list. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is funny, because I thought this page was that page until I made the revert earlier today. so good job fixing that. I shall add them to the Cash Money Records article and redirect this article there. STATic message me! 06:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't even realize that there were three...it's weird, because we've both been editing all three pages (mostly keeping out the redlinks)...and yet never noticed. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is funny, because I thought this page was that page until I made the revert earlier today. so good job fixing that. I shall add them to the Cash Money Records article and redirect this article there. STATic message me! 06:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, I guess I wouldn't mind that. If no one else objects, feel free to make the move and redirect. BTW, as you probably saw, I just redirected the List of Cash Money Records artists. No matter what, we definitely can't have a "artists", "current artists", and "former artists" list. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, the list of former artists could be linked under a "see also" section, as they are no longer relevant to the label, being former artists. Just having the current Cash Money Records roster would be proper, and is only around 20 something. This would not completely dwarf the rest of the article. A two or three column list would do that just fine. STATic message me! 02:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)