This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The article reads "Some of these are actually set in the city; others were shot in Pittsburgh but set in another real or fictional location.". Can we flag which ones are which? ClarkBHM20:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Also, what exactly is the criteria for inclusion here? For example: Land of the Dead was predominately shot in Canada with very little shot in Pittsburgh. Should that really qualify as a film shot in Pittsburgh? IrishGuytalk22:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Although I am the chief contributor to this page I do not believe I included Land of the Dead, however I think they were considering that the skyline shots were used, similar to the Steven Segal flick Fire Down Below. Marketdiamond (talk) 10:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One is an article on films set or filmed in Pittsburgh the other is a glorified disamig page with films called "Pittsburgh" either in production or in releasing it. Because of this I think its a bad idea to combine them. Marketdiamond (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any movies from the "Pittsburgh (film)" page that do not meet the requirement for being in the "List of films and television shows shot in Pittsburgh" article? If not, is it a bad idea to direct the disambig page to the section specifically about a list of films that have "Pittsburgh" in the title? --Battlefield1181 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting idea, it could work, however the main page currently catagorizes them by year, we could list these films twice in both the chronological section and a special section with "Film with the name Pittsburgh in them" and then link the "See Also" on the Pittsburgh article to that section, however it would only make sense in programming wiki not much sense on the page per se (some films listed once, some twice etc.) Curious idea though, willing to listen to any creative solutions here for the main film page. Marketdiamond (talk) 08:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are we going to allow music videos in this list too? If so, will we need a title change? I ask because "Black and Yellow" was added to the list, but it is neither a film (in the classic sense) nor a television show.
--Battlefield1181 (talk) 03:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also I might add the video is placed under the "Television" heading, which seems kind of strange, but I want to get an understanding of where music videos stand first before moving it. --Battlefield1181 (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, love to hear more views on this, mine is that although this started with the neat little boxes of TV (little screen) and Film (big screen), television presently defies an easy definition, 500+ channels, TIVO, DVR, pay-per-view, access to out of market "tower" stations, etc. so in this fluid definition television is anything that isn't produced for a film audience IMHO, in the next few months we might need further feedback since TV is nearing its traditionally defined end (youtube, hulu, netflix online anyone?). For now I am of the view that if it has been commercially marketed or produced (even PBS) outside of the big screen it qualifies for the TV section, but hey in a few years we might laugh at this definition like I do my parents bell bottoms yearbooks. Marketdiamond (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since these lists have grown with added research and with the explosion in the last few years of new films and shows, I would like to see it split into a TV article and a widescreen article. Thoughts? Marketdiamond (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speak now or forever hold your peace . . . been over a month, splitting underway, especially since contributors keep adding Batman and Tom Cruise movies to the tv section. Marketdiamond (talk) 13:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
