Talk:List of obsolete taxa

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eulipotyphla

MSW3 does not use Eulipotyphla. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but the MSW 3 classification seems to be out of date in this case, as molecular data clearly show that MSW 3's Soricomorpha is non-monophyletic (hedgehogs and shrews are more closely related to each other than to moles), which would suggest a return to Eulipotyphla. I think [1] clearly shows that Eulipotyphla is still in use, slightly more so than Soricomorpha. I think this list should focus on long-defunct taxa rather than on taxonomic disputes that are still in existance. Ucucha 16:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sounds good to me. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carcharocles

I recently found out that Megalodon, as a species, has been reclassified at least three times since its discovery in 1835. First, it was thought of as a relative of the Great White Shark and placed under the genus Charcharodon. Then, it was moved to the genus Carcharocles in the 1990s. Later fossil examination revealed that there is no meaningful distinction between the genus Carcharocles and another named Otodus, in the family Otodontidae. All four known members of Carcharocles were subsequently renamed Otodus. So now it’s Otodus megalodon. 24.129.225.138 (talk) 14:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]