Jump to content

Talk:London Buses route 117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Buses route 117. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of material by Andrew Riley

[edit]

With regards to Jeni's attempted wholescale revert to Andrew Riley's recent edits made to the page I would like to ask, on the article talk page what exactly Jeni finds unreliable about TfL's website, which is considered to be a reliable primary source. Wikipedia policy dictates that someone is entitled to remove contested unreliable sources, and claims sourced to those sources; however from what I can see here, the 'revert' button is being used as as a catch-all club, by doing so, the removal of cited material occurs, which is considered to be a form of vandalism. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]