Talk:Lord & Schryver
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Defunct AfC
[edit]This AfC Draft:Lord & Schryver, Landscape Architects was rejected for being too much like an advert, which makes sense because it was written by the executive director of the conservancy. I'm willing to undelete and userfy the info if anyone wants to see if they can make use of it. I didn't look closely but it may be somewhat of a copyvio of the conservancy's website but it also has 7 sources. Of interest is the claim (justified, in my personal opinion) they were personal, as well as business, partners. Valfontis (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Oregon
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Stub-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Stub-Class Horticulture and gardening articles
- Low-importance Horticulture and gardening articles
- Wikipedia requested images of gardening
- WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles