Talk:M-93 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Can some more detail about the physical environment the route passes through be added to the route description? The current route description seems a little dry as it mainly describes intersections with other roads.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just one concern with the route description, otherwise the article looks good. Dough 48 72 18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? Imzadi 1979 → 19:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The route description looks better, so I will pass the article. Dough 48 72 19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]