Talk:M2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ESR at Fuerzas Commando 2012
[edit]I found evidence that the ESR has been bought and is being used by Colombian Special Forces here at post #18.
This is the photo. Can someone please include this information as an update to the page?
Brody Kennen (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- The chasis stock does look like the stock used on the XM2010. The barrel to suppressor distance appears shorter when compared to the XM2010 images so I am in doubt.--Francis Flinch (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's the iffy part. It might be an M-24 SWS, BUT... the thing is that standard M-24s are not suppressor capable out of the box and are also not that short. Those two strikes against the M-24 would push me closer to the XM2010 with a new barrel. The other thing is that, because I can't see the receiver. It might be a Remington MSR. Which would explain the short barrel with suppressor capability. Looking at the rest of the gun now, it does look like it. I had forgotten there was even an MSR. I might go post over there to get a confirm. Brody Kennen (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Is that still built on a Remington 700 Action
[edit]Is good to know, essential info for the article.24.227.157.82 (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- From the article: This chambering to dimensionally larger cartridges is possible because the M24 Sniper Weapon System was designed to use the "long-action" version of the Remington 700 receiver.--Francis Flinch (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on M2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202144224/http://www.advanced-armament.com/product.aspx?pid=196 to http://www.advanced-armament.com/product.aspx?pid=196
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722210935/https://www.neco.navy.mil/upload/N00164/N0016409RJN30000209RJN30_0002_att.pdf to https://www.neco.navy.mil/upload/N00164/N0016409RJN30000209RJN30_0002_att.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090926061220/http://www.jbmballistics.com/~jbm/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.0.cgi to http://www.jbmballistics.com/~jbm/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.0.cgi
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on M2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128210007/http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/en/Firearms/Sniper%20Rifles/XM2010.aspx to http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/en/Firearms/Sniper%20Rifles/XM2010.aspx
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://peosoldier.army.mil/newpeo/Equipment/Temp.asp?id=IW_XM2010 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111114024552/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010armament/TuesdayLandmarkBTamilio.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010armament/TuesdayLandmarkBTamilio.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714034725/http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2011/03/marine-corps-sniper-rifle-m110-031711w/ to http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2011/03/marine-corps-sniper-rifle-m110-031711w/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120615115641/http://www.leupold.com/tactical/products/scopes/mark-4-ert-riflescopes/mark-4-6-5-20x50mm-ert-m5-front-focal to http://www.leupold.com/tactical/products/scopes/mark-4-ert-riflescopes/mark-4-6-5-20x50mm-ert-m5-front-focal/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011094032/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2009infantrysmallarms/tuesdaysessioniii8524.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2009infantrysmallarms/tuesdaysessioniii8524.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://peosoldier.army.mil/newpeo/Equipment/Temp.asp?id=IW_ESR
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Weird sentence, not sure how to fix though
[edit]"The XM2010 addressed the problem with a .300 Winchester Magnum round that can hit targets out to 1,200 m (1,312 yd) with 1 MOA accuracy, half again as far as the M24's 80 m (87 yd)."
That appears to make no sense, obviously 1312 yards isn't 'half again as far' compared to 87 yards. What were they really trying to say here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.80.227 (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles