Talk:M7 (railcar)

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New York City / Passenger trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

New York City: Public Transportation Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as High-importance).

Comment

Whover edted this page, Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WngLdr34 (talk • contribs) .

Moving between carriages

It looks from the pictures like passengers aren’t allowed to move between units, but are there passenger gangways between the two carriages of a married pair? David Arthur 17:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Passengers are allowed to move about the married pair (to get to the bathrooms, they might have no choice but to). But they not allowed to move between "units". Pacific Coast Highway ^{{talk • contribs}} 21:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Passengers are required to be in the front 4 cars on LIRR trains stopping at Forest Hills and Key Gardens. I always get on the front at Penn, but assume you can move forward after the train is underway. Rusty 22:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes-- Although there are small signs saying it is prohibited to do so while in motion, day to day operations frequently require passing from car to car.

Whats a Unit? Plyhmrp 20:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)plyhmrp[reply]

A unit consists of two cars that are semi-permanently connected by a link bar, otherwise known as a married pair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Railer (talk • contribs) 23:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CORRECTION: Yes, they are. Pacific Coast Highway ^{{talk • contribs}} 03:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

M-7 (railcar) → M7 (railcar) — While not an uncommon mistake, from the MTA's own literature, it appears that there is no hyphen in the cars' actual designation. See here, especially starting on page 21, where the electric fleet is discussed; no hyphens in any of the M# series cars. Un-hyphenated version is currently a redirect. Other cars in the series, including M8 (railcar), are un-hyphenated. Should probably move M-9 (railcar) while we're at it. --oknazevad (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - If for no other reason than for consistency among the other M series railcars. Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support per Acps110. I normally don't focus that much on individual train models, but if there's no hyphen, there's no hyphen. The biggest concern I have is that the transition to the new name might be a little difficult, but I have a feeling this might be a minor obstacle. ----DanTD (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M7 (railcar). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M7 (railcar). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120003741/http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/commuter-and-regional-trains/single-deck-electric-multiple-units/m-7?docID=0901260d800102a8 to http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/commuter-and-regional-trains/single-deck-electric-multiple-units/m-7?docID=0901260d800102a8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]