Talk:MEDL Mobile

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because MEDL Mobile is a publicly traded company under the stock symbol MEDL.

The company has developed more than 100 mobile applications and works with clients that range from The New York Times Company (About.com) to Monster.com to Teleflora to Medtronic. The company has filed for a patent on it's proprietary recommendation engine. MEDL Mobile has launched an Application Incubator that has generated more than 100,000 mobile concepts from a community of tens of thousands of contributors. MEDL has built more than two dozen of these incubated app concepts and several of them have reached the top of Apple's App Store.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... The content has been amended and improved. Thank you for your patience.ShinyMEDLObjects (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC) ShinyMEDLObjects (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 9 February 2014

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. See comment below

Please delete: "In November 2013 MEDL was accused of making elaborate claims through press releases as a part of a pump and dump scheme with its company stock.[1]"

It is a link to article that can't be read unless there is a paid subscription. So the line above might be advertising.

Also, if if the article were available without payment, would any article be allowed on any page dealing with a stock (like any article giving positive or negative assessments)?

Thank you for your time.

MetaBusey (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

_{(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)}

I have edited the article to make clear that it was an opinion piece. However, I have not removed it. Being behind a pay wall does not make using a source "advertising". And no, not all "articles" can be used as references. Ones which are simply press releases from the company are not suitable as sources for positive claims, although they can be used to verify basic facts, e.g. date of founding, name of chief executive etc. As for negative claims, they'd have to be from a reliable source, and reported as an opinion piece if that is what they are. I'd consider Seeking Alpha to be a reliable source. Incidentally, there is zero independent, in-depth coverage of this company apart from its own press releases and indeed the Seeking Alpha piece, which calls the subject's notability into question. Voceditenore (talk) 13:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending revision rejected

I have rejected this pending change.

There was extended copypaste from copyright sources. See Copyvio Detector.
It had a promotional, unencyclopedic tone. See especially the last two sentences which are particularly inappropriate, but the problem is pervasive.
The revision removed all categories, formatting, and previous referencing. The article should be incrementally improved, not simply overwritten with what is essentially a press-release
There was completely inapproriate use of inline external links (most of which were not independent sources). Please read WP:External links for guidance.

If the editor of that revision has any affiliation whatsoever to this company or its executives, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for guidance before attempting to edit it again. If you are editing this article as part of your employment with this company or as a PR/editing contractor, please familiarise yourself with our Terms of Use concerning paid editing. Also please familiarise yourself with these guidelines for writing encyclopedic articles on companies. Voceditenore (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]