A fact from María Isabella Cordero appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 18 December 2012 by reviewer Danger (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I know there are three references (only one in English) but the statement "The shell casings found at the crime scene belonged to an assault rifle, which is a weapon often used by organized crime. But the motive behind the assassination remains unknown." is misleading. Even though stated in the English reference, "The shell casings found at the crime scene belonged to an assault rifle" is ambiguous and should be removed from the article. "Assault rifle" cannot be defined properly. Also "which is a weapon often used by organized crime" is more emotion than fact and is even more ambiguous given that "assault rifle" cannot be defined properly. I recommend that the above quote be shortened to just "The motive behind the assassination remains unknown" Stretch0069 (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I guess my issue with the statement is that it just seems that it was thrown in there. Saying that they were casings from an assault rifle is ambiguous and just seems an attempt to make "assault rifles" look bad. I know that is all the reference says, but that doesn't mean it has to be put in the article. The term "assault rifle" is just a term used by those with an agenda to create fear. To me, it just doesn't add anything to the article. The reader can go to the references and determine for themselves what the writer was trying to say. I'm not saying it has to be changed, just thought it seemed out of place. Cheers :) Stretch0069 (talk) 09:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may be right. I didn't see the term assault rifle as an agenda for fear... I guess it depends from what background we have and how they say it. Here in Mexico they use the term a lot because the cartels use all kinds of "assault rifles," and it's easier and more practical to call it that than listing them. Most people aren't even familiar with all the kinds of guns, so the term may probably be fit.
In my opinion, the authors wrote that assault rifles were involved because that would mean that organized crime is probably behind the killing. Regular citizens in Mexico cannot own assault rifles legally. Good day :) ComputerJA (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Southern Indiana supported by WikiProject Journalism and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.