Talk:Mark Mattson

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

LogicandProportion (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (Promotional SPA Per contribs)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Neutrality Dispute

I'd like to first say that I have absolutely no doubts as to the calibre of this scientist & his achievements, having read quite a lot of his work as a PhD student. However, this article is badly structured and reads like a university publicity page and could really do with being toned down in terms of the language used.

I will have a look over this page and see if I can make some improvements over the next week or so - please feel free to challenge me on any adjustments I make.

86.137.47.132 (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy nominated

This page is awful and indicative of self-promotional puffery. Should be deleted in full. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epigrammatist (talk • contribs)

COI or paid editing?

@Signimu:, @Zefr:, @Alexbrn: Some strange edits appears to be going on with this page via this account LogicandProportion and on the intermittent fasting article, any idea what to do here? He's re-written most of this article. It looks like conflict of interest. Pinging you all because you know about this topic more than me. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed all his edits, per conflict of interest and other problems. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It did look a lot like COI and/or paid editing. - Scarpy (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Signimu: unfortunately LogicandProportion won't give up, he's restored the content 3 times now. This is definitely bad COI. Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]