Jump to content

Talk:Matt Moore (baseball)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matt Moore (baseball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Matt Moore (baseball)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will review MWright96 (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Minor leagues

[edit]

Tampa Bay Rays

[edit]

San Francisco Giants

[edit]

Texas Rangers

[edit]

Detroit Tigers

[edit]

Pitcher profile

[edit]

Shall put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query each of the points raised in this review MWright96 (talk) 11:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96 Thank you for the quick and thorough review! I believe everything has been addressed :) Kncny11 (shoot) 14:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kncny11: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk08:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moore pitching with the Tampa Bay Rays in 2012.
Moore pitching with the Tampa Bay Rays in 2012.
  • Reviewed: Herbert Herbert
  • Comment: A different image of him with the Giants can be used if ALT2 is chosen, as he was playing with that team at the time.

Improved to Good Article status by Kncny11 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is long enough (15537 characters) and new enough (promoted as a good article on May 23). As it is a good article, it meets core policies and guidelines. The hook is cited, under 200 characters and is interesting. A QPQ is done. Image mentioned is used in the article, looks fine in 100 × 100px and is free to use (under 2.0 Generic license). The main hook is preferred. Good to go. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]