Talk:May 1982 Central America floods

May 1982 Central America floods was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 21, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Floods Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Aletta (1982)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 18:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"until May 28. shortly thereafter," - Capitalize "shortly"
- Shoot. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"$365 million (1982 USD).[8] with damage" - I would change the period to a comma
- Changed it to a semicolon.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"and precipitation totals wre as high as23.3 in (590 mm)." - Three things: (1. "wre" is a typo (2. add a space between as and 23.3 (3. There were higher rainfall totals observed from Aletta. Here it says Aletta dropped 57.36 inches of rain. However, I cannot can only find mirror sites as the source. I would suggest that you look for a source for that, but if you cannot find it, but leave the maximum rainfall as 23.3 inches.
- I found a source. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"A red cross official stated" - "red cross" should be capitalized
- It's not a proper noun. If it was the U.S. Red Cross, it would be capitalized. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"[5] (10 of which drowned in floodwaters)[6] Roughly 20,000 people were" - Add a period before reference #6
- Good call. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"red cross and United Nations" - again, "red cross" should be capitalized
- See above.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"a month's worth of flood supply but officials feared" - "flood supply"? You mean "food supply"?
- Heh, yeah. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
With that said and done, I am now going to pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Aletta (1982). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923101618/http://emdat.be/disaster-list to http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Central America floods

It always seemed suspicious to me that a small tropical storm hundreds of miles away could have caused the disastrous floods in Central America. I checked in with Philippe Papin, the expert on Central American Gyres, and he confirmed my suspicions: accompanying tweet. The floods were caused by a prolonged rain event from a Central American Gyre, not Aletta. Although news reports explicity state Aletta, it was not the cause. This is backed up by the Monthly Weather Review making no mention of the floods whatsoever in relation to Eastern Pacific tropical cyclones. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 21:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In order to see if @Cyclonebiskit: is correct here, I looked at the newspapers cited and noticed that they are all American based. This makes me wonder if someone put noticed that Aletta was operating in the Pacific and certain newspapers just attributed the floods to that. As a result, I would suggest merging the MH with 1982 Pacific hurricane season and moving the rest of the content to either 1982 Central American floods or even better starting a list of floods in Nicaragua and or Honduras.Jason Rees (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, move. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see this until now, but @Cyclonebiskit:, thanks for looking into this. I have no issues merging the 10 year old article of mine. My hunch is 2E formed from the gyre but I have no sources to confirm this so. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]