This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tokusatsu on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TokusatsuWikipedia:WikiProject TokusatsuTemplate:WikiProject TokusatsuTokusatsu articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Megaguirus was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Some of the phrasing in the "Character history" section is a bit confusing with the use of "althoughs". I'd also look into How to write plot summaries:Characters, Locations, etc. to make it a bit more understandable for people not as familiar with the Godzilla films. The "Abilities" section
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Toho Kingdom appears to be a fan site which would not be a reliable source. I have faith that a more reliable source could give this information. Are there official toho sites/books or godzilla sites/books with this information?
"Similar to nearly every monster in the Godzilla series, Megaguirus was at one point exposed to radioactive materials, resulting in a substantial increase in strength, speed and size." This needs a citation, namely the "nearly every monster in the Godzilla series" part.
Could we have an image that shows more of the character? In the character's story sections it alludes to parts of the body on the monster that we can not see from that picture.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Before I go into the review further, the cites referring to the Toho Kingdom will have to change as fan sites are not considered reliable sources. If suitable ones can be found, than we can have them placed there instead. Good luck with improving the article! Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm afraid there was not any changes in the article since this review and I the TohoKingdom site seems to be fan-based which is not reliable. This article will need more reviews and information about the monster from a critical position as well. Take a look at articles on other fictional characters like Pyramid Head for an idea of what we're looking for and I'll be happy to take a look at this again. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]