Talk:Melangyna viridiceps

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melangyna viridiceps is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Diptera

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

There are is some discussion about the correct identification of the organism in the photo going on a the TAXACOM discussion list. You can read it here:

http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom/2008-July/027438.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerHyam (talk • contribs) 15:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been fixed, thanks. Dyanega (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should note, however, that even the photo presently linked may NOT be Melangyna viridiceps - it does not appear to be Simosyrphus, however, which the other photos were (the yellow scutellum, at least, is a very obvious feature). Dyanega (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]