Talk:Melbourne line

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Melbourne line article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Derbyshire Low‑importance

The article on Melbourne line is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article needs a map

Military history: British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Changes

I have made some big changes on this subject and will continue to do so using local Melbourne sources. Histman (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone has any copyright free photos please let me know. (Histman (talk) 17:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Photos

Are these on the Melbourne line?

Title

Is the correctly titled Melbourne Line or Melbourne Military railway? --ClemRutter (talk) 09:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Melbourne line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Form of article

There are a number of difficulties here.

The "Remains" section isn't properly cited. Old photographs of a derelict engine shed don't support the statement that "There are several remains of the railway". this is original research. The same applies to the two locomotives and a coach are owned by the K&ESR. The citation for this is from 2008, fourteen years ago. The present tense should never be used in this situation, see WP policy on this.

I'm not sure about the article title, the Melbourne Line. I can't find a general usage of that title. Even the leading refrence book refers to it more prosaically as the Derby to Ashby Branch. ("The Melbourne Military Railway and the Derby to Ashbury Branch").

Finally the text is rather military-heavy. That's not the fault of the military enthusiasts here, but some civilian content would be valuable, if someone has the relevant reference books. Afterbrunel (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]