Talk:Mendeley

Open Access Mid‑importance

Mendeley is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

POV language

Re: 23:57, 20 November 2009 134.95.82.182 (talk) (5,142 bytes) (Remove Non-NPOV 'Known Bugs' section)--Have deleted word "nasty" and the exclamation point. What remains is a fact, not a point of view. This was posted out of sympathy for MS Word users who cannot discover why their text box feature stopped working since this software was installed. Proyster (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Developmental time line section

Why is the "Developmental time line" section part of the main article? What does it add that wikipedia users need to know? --159.178.249.176 (talk) 14:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History section

What is the relevance of this line: "On August 2011, a similar service was launched by the University of Warwick, called Piirus." --This appears to be a completely different type of service (website aimed at networking). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.109.200 (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mendeley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524065302/http://www.mysciencework.com/en/ to http://www.mysciencework.com/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested update

Hi, I'd like to suggest removing the section "Vendor lock-in controversy" (and also the third paragraph of the intro which exactly duplicates this text), or at least tone it down as it currently makes the situation sound more dramatic than is necessary. The issue is clearly explained here: https://blog.mendeley.com/2019/01/31/the-importance-of-interoperability as being a technical error, which has since been rectified. It is still simple for users to export their libraries to Zotero, so nobody is locked-in. The existing text is factually incorrect, and sourced to Zotero (a competitor of Mendeley).

Can you please let me know your thoughts on whether this would be a suitable change to make? I work for RELX, but I'm suggesting this update in good faith - it doesn't seem to make for an accurate article at the moment. Ryoba (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Impact of QuillBot to the Writing Skills of BEEd Students

The Impact of QuillBot to the Writing Skills of BEEd Students 110.54.160.228 (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]