Talk:Mercer Union

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

AfD

Please delete, this is an article about an art center no more notable than any other. The only references are to articles that are really about an artist who displayed there, not the gallery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.68.46 (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand, you'd find this issue with many art centres, since most press coverage would be about the artist and not the centre specifically. However, in this case (and arguably most such cases), this is very much about the gallery as well. This exhibition was a result of gallery programming, and the actual references do talk about the gallery and their approach to curating and promotion. The sources are very much about the centre. freshacconci talktalk 12:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notabity has been establish or it would have been deleted in 2005. Kyle1278 (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... that's not true. Lots of articles are around for a while before they get nominated for deletion. The appropriate venue for this discussion is AfD, not you call me a vandal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.68.46 (talk) 03:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but go through the proper procedure. You don't just tag it. I can't imagine this will be deleted though. This article needs improving, and there are references out there. freshacconci talktalk 03:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'll do a procedural nom. freshacconci talktalk 03:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mercer Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]