Talk:Midrash halakha

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Untitled

"The younger Halakah, despite the dot over the ה, reads "reḥoḳah" and makes it refer to "derek," even determining how far away one must be to be excluded from participation in the feast."

If this is how it is meant to read, the english translation of "derek" should be provided, otherwise most english readers, the vast majority of whom won't understand Hebrew, will be wondering who Derek is, and what people had against him to the extent that he was excluded from participation. --francis 23:20, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is a hopeless example that is unsuitable for Wikipedia. I suggest it is removed. JFW | T@lk 23:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted revert

@Editor2020: reverted a set of changes I made yesterday. There was no discussion, and the extent of the rationale (*given in the edit summary) is "Restore better." Reverting material requires a better rationale than that. See WP:ETIQ. Dovid (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding references this time.Editor2020 (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]