Talk:Mon people
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Mangrai was copied or moved into Mon people with this edit on 01:28, 3 March 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of History of Laos was copied or moved into Mon people with this edit on 11:37, 7 March 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Capital
[edit]Thaton was the capital of the Mon. Bagan (or Pagan) was the Burmese capital.
Newly added text
[edit]I removed the following two section just added today and put them here for discussion. The text is written in very poor English and I can't even make out what is meant in some places. Also, the text is completely unsourced. However, it looks like it might contain some valuable information. Maybe somebody can decipher this and find some sources and re-add it after it's cleaned up.--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 18:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- ==Mon education==
- The new Mon generation are retreiving advanced educational level elsewhere, no matter fewer persistance. The youngsters are to be educated in both Mon and Burmese schools in the Mon state, Burma. As there are some restrictions to receive higher national level of Mon schools in contention with others, the generation have to redirect their education into Burmese High Schools and universities. That's is the situation why the University of Mawlamyine becomes populated with Mon new generation. Regardless of this affiliation, many Mon children suffer from luck of education in rural areas and Mon refugees camps near Thai-Burma border.
- ==Mon survival==
- Since the last fallen kingdom of Mon people in the 18th century, about 250 years ago, Mon have been suffering from lots of difficulties for survival. Due to genocide by Burmans, Mon were striving to keep their identity alive and finding their way out. In the reasons of keeping their identity, preserving old stylish culture and language, Mon have adoped a special day of identity, The Mon National Day which they have been celebrating annually since 1947 until today. However, the new Mon generation survives by fleeing abroad, leading to Mon refugees camps, which also surprises from increasing diseases such as AIDS, malaria, and influenza.
- The most critical reason which opens the lights to Mon people is that the finding of Mon Buddhist Priest, Luongphaw Ajar Tala Uttama of Wat Wiwekara, Sangklaburi, Thailand. He founded and developed the Sangkhlaburi district in Thailand which he gave shelter to Mon refugees who fled from Burma.
- The Mon National Day
- Mon refugees
- Mon life abroad
"related groups" info removed from infobox
[edit]For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 20:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Seal monstate.png
[edit]Image:Seal monstate.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Mon in Thailand
[edit]Nothing abt the Mon in Thailand?
Holocaust of Mon
[edit]That article deals in some detail with he very restricted time period of 1757 and immmediately following; since this is niot covered well in the main article, it should go there as a merge. I will carry it out soon if no objections. DGG (talk) 06:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Mon population
[edit]Are there really 8 million Mon? According to Demographics of Burma, the Mon people make up only 2% of Burma's population of ~ 50 million. Now that's 1 million. — Stevey7788 (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Many Mon has been assimilated through marriages. In major cities, Mon is rarely spoken. SWH® talk 08:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Removed texts
[edit]I removed this text "Recent studies have adduced evidence indicating that the Mon and Bamar share some common genetic ancestry. A genetic study done on Mon from Southern Myanmar and Bamar from Southern Myanmar showed a high prevalence of a particular glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutation not found among Khmers, Laotians or Thais.[1]"
The reason is that the texts cited on a study done in 2008; "Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase mutations in Mon and Burmese of southern Myanmar." The result of the study suggests that Mon people share a common ancestry with Burmese rather than Cambodians. In my opinion, this study is obsolete and reinventing the wheel. Here are my reasons. First of all, of course, today's Mon share a common ancestry with Burmese as the Mon have been effectively assimilated to Bamar/Burmese for centuries. Second of all, being the same language family has nothing to do with common ancestry. Moreover, the study is just a cross-sectional study and prone to selection bias. Peter Moe (talk) 11:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Thailand articles
- Mid-importance Thailand articles
- WikiProject Thailand articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- High-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Myanmar articles
- High-importance Myanmar articles
- WikiProject Myanmar articles
- C-Class Southeast Asia articles
- High-importance Southeast Asia articles
- C-Class Laos articles
- Unknown-importance Laos articles
- Laos work group articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles