Talk:Mona Simion

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 April 2022 by reviewer MurielMary (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Moved from draft[edit]

Selected talks

Simion has presented her research widely, including a range of prestigious keynote talks at award ceremonies and subject specific societies:

The Young Epistemologist Prize Address. Resistance to Evidence and the Duty to Believe. Rutgers Epistemology Conference 2022, New York, USA. Keynote Talk: Resistance to Evidence. European Epistemology Network Meeting, Glasgow, UK, 2022. Keynote Talk: Resistance to Evidence. British Society of Theory of Knowledge, 2022. Mind Fellow Address. Epistemic Norms, Function First. The Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and the Mind Association 2019, Durham University, UK, 2019. Epistemic Norms: Action and Practical Reasoning. Meeting of the European Normativity Network, University of Stockholm, Sweden, 2017. MurielMary (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from article[edit]

Media

Simion has been featured in the Daily Nous and Research Professional News. She has been interviewed for several blogs, podcasts, magazines, and for New Books Network. MurielMary (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on duplicate publication[edit]

A section on duplicate publication by Simion has been removed twice.

84.68.240.3 stated the following: "Contentious material about living persons that is poorly sourced. There are several problems with this paragraph: (1) any such material needs to come with two admissible references; however, pub peer is not an admissible reference source, since any internet user can freely edit (2) the allegation is in conflict with the UK Research Integrity Policy in that the two papers are cross-cited (3) Springer (Philosophical Studies) have denied the allegation"

However:

The primary source is an official statement by an academic journal, Analysis. Their statement is a reliable source with a stable URL (DOI).
PubPeer is a post-publication peer review website, where the extent of the overlap has been documented. The claim posted there can easily be verified by comparing the articles.
There are no public sources that support the claim that Springer confirms or denies the case of duplicate publication, but Simion is an associate editor at Philosophical Studies, which is a clear conflict of interest.
Cross-citation means that this is not a case of plagiarism, which is not what the section claims either. The section links to duplicate publication, defined as "publishing the same intellectual material more than once". The linked Wikipedia article also explains why this is commonly seen as problematic.
Whether the UK Research Integrity Policy allows this seems beside the point as well: the public fact is that an official "Statement of Redundant Publication" was issued by one of the journals.

If anything, the section on duplicate publication is better sourced than other claims in the article. While the other parts are about positive achievements, it is not contentious that an official statement was published, and it seems exceptional enough to warrant mention. SocialEpisteme (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need a reliable secondary source to justify inclusion here. Come back when you have got one: until then the material can and should be removed. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The statement can be read in full in another academic repository: [1]. This repository also provides a stable link, but then it's up to the user to click on the PDF and to go to page 10 [2]. Is that sufficient, and if so which link is to be preferred? SocialEpisteme (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a primary source. You need a reliable secondary source. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 12:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been discussed at both BLP/N and RS/N. There is a clear consensus on both pages that these sources are inadequate for a BLP and that this material should stay off the page until there is better sourcing. See in particular this comment [3]. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]