Talk:MonoDevelop

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft: .NET Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject .NET (assessed as Mid-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

arguments contra merge

A merge with Xamari is no good idea. You would merge a manufactor of many produchts with one of it's products. (Would you also suggest to merge Microsoft and Visual Studio?)

A merge with Stetic might be ok. See discussion contribution "Expanding Article Content".

A merge with GTK Sharp is no good idea. You would merge a IDE with one of the libraries used by it. (Would you also suggest to merge Visual Studio and System.Windows.Forms?)

A merge with Mono is no good idea. You would merge a IDE with it's target platform. (Would you also suggest to merge Visual Studio and .NET?)

By pz0151

comment

This should be a good start. If there is an issue with this seeming likes an advert, please discus.

Merge this article with Mono and / or Xamarin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.60.194 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding Article Content

From the lead paragraph, it looks like there should be sections:

Features This section should discuss source control integration and supported SCMs, IntelliSense-like behavior, what about MonoDevelop resembles Eclipse and where they differ. Comparison to .NET support offered by Eclipse, if any, would also be good. Elaboration on support for other .NET languages would be good, as well. Is there a class/service modeling tool? Globalization, internationalization, and localization support?
Stetic Stetic is now featured as part of MonoDevelop. Its page on MonoDevelop says that, "This document is meant as an introductory tutorial to Stetic, the GUI development tool of the MonoDevelop IDE." Thus, it would be more appropriate to discuss Stetic as part of this article rather than dedicating a separate article to Stetic. (This is in opposition to the current link to Stetic.)

I don't have time to work on this now, but if anyone else wants to have a go, that would be great. I don't want to add totally uninformative stub sections to the article, since the article looks okay as-is, if a bit skimpy. Once you've written some content, it might be good to put it on the main page so others might be motivated to add to it. —Jay Uv. (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MonoDevelop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]