Talk:Morris Animal Foundation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why created

This foundation is mentioned in thirteen Wikipedia articles. That seems like enough to warrant an article. Nick Beeson (talk) 13:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find reliable 3rd party sources. Unless you have reliable sources, you cannot have an article about it. thank youSupdiop (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

Wow. I am in the process of writing this article. I tagged it with "Stub" clearly indicating it is not done. This article was tagged SEVEN minutes after I first posted it.

I spend an hour eating breakfast, come back to look for outside references, and BOOM deletion.

There really needs to be a "48 hour" rule, that prohibits articles from being tagged for deletion until two days have passed. This will give reasonable authors time to complete the article.

To the person who tagged it: Please slow down. Let people have a chance to complete their work before pointing out how it is incomplete. It hurts no one to give them time to clean up their articles. Nor is it bad to post an incomplete article. I have done that on purpose. It is amazing how often other authors will quickly add material, making my initial posting a group effort, and completing it better than I ever could. Nick Beeson (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]