Jump to content

Talk:NASA Pathfinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

On 13 August 2001, it set an altitude record for a propeller-driven aircraft, reaching at 96,863 feet (29,511 m), the Earth's atomsphere at that altitude is similar to the atmosphere to Mars,

... similar to the atmophere to Mars at which altitude? --Abdull 11:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol isn't it obvious? The altitude that is mentioned in the sentence! Gfad1 13:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, the altitude at Mars. Obviously Mars' atmospheric pressure also decreases with increasing altitude. RockAteer 15:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming explanation

[edit]

I've renamed the article so that it can incorporate all 3 aircraft in the program. Since Helios was lost and Pathfinder-Plus was just inducted into NASM, it is the logical choice for an article title. Will expand the article over the next couple of days. Akradecki 16:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Record claim bogus

[edit]

> On 13 August, 2001, it set an unofficial world record for sustained altitude by a winged aircraft <

Which is not true. The official FAI world record is held by soviet test pilot Alexey Fedotov flying the E-266, a specially modified MiG-25 Foxbat fighter jet and high-speed reconnaisance airplane. His record of 37,650 meters (123.520 ft) still stands, but commander Fedotov later died in a MiG-31 prototype crash.

[The american SR-71 cannot do more than 24-26km (85.300 ft) altitude because the fuselage would suffer aerodynamic pitch-up and disintegrate while descending. FAI regulations require that the record plane land in one piece and the pilot(s) walk away from it. Whether the engines inside are permanently ruined, as has beeen the case in some russian records is not relevant according to the rules). 82.131.210.162 (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're richt, I've changed the wording and replaced the newspaper reference with one to FAI. - Dammit (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we change "due to the failure of the winds to shift as predicted" in the paragraph about the crash to "due to a failure to predict a shift in the winds". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.63.40 (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Status?

[edit]

The article follows the development of these aircraft up to the crash of the Helios, then abruptly ends. So did the program end directly as a result of the crash? If so, is any research being done which succeeded this? --202.28.179.5 (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

which one stayed up the longest ?

[edit]

I read the whole article, there is even a table, and still can't tell which one has the record, or at least out of the ones listed on the table...

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NASA Pathfinder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on NASA Pathfinder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on NASA Pathfinder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]