Talk:NED

Proposal to split page

Does anyone object to splitting the "NED" (acronym) references and references to "Ned" the given name? See Ted vs. TED as an example. LibertyHiller (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Wow, that's the first dab I've seen that looked like that. The "Teds" seems a much better way to go. Wbm1058 (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A merge suggestion was made as an edit summary in 2006, and merge done with ed summ "merged with NED, per WP:DAB#NAME". But i'm pretty sure ~~we are~~ the guideline is still in effect to split off names to an SIA from a Dab in cases like Carver when the names are numerous, and that certainly can be applied here.
  --Jerzy•t 20:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I split out just the given names, to Ned (given name).
    Some may feel that the remaining Ned entries are less urgent to split out from the NED ones. I favor that split as well as the one i effected, but i don't presently care to do the work myself.
    --Jerzy•t 04:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]