Talk:National Highway (Australia)

	Australian roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Transport Mid‑importance

	Australia portal National Highway (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Route Through Adelaide

Hi All. Wondering if someone can clear something up about the route the National Highway takes through Adelaide. According to many wiki pages, it enters Adelaide as Port Wakefield Road (A1) to Grand Junction Road (A16) then Hampstead Road (A16) and so on. However on actually road signage the national route comes off of Port Wakefield Road at the Salisbury Highway Overpass, and follows Salisbury Highway to the start of the Port River Expressway, then down South Road to Grand Junction and then to Hampstead Road. Is this actually the case? LukeNE (talk) 00:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Highway

The map accompanying this article does not include the Pacific Highway between (vicinity of) Newcastle and Brisbane. It is my understanding that when the National Highway concept was established in the early 1970's, a decision was made that the prefered through route for long-distance traffic and road freight was to be the New England Highway and not the Pacific Highway. This was somewhat controversial at the time. The map currently displayed with the article reflects this - the Pacific Highway between Newcastle and Brisbane is not on it. The New England highway had less mountains, less bridges, fewer towns with local traffic conflicts, fewer low-speed winding sections, and was considered easier to upgrade, compared to the Pacific highway of that era.

However, around 1990, two very bad bus crashes drew attention to the Pacific Highway. Due to the rapid increase in population of the NSW North Coast region, road upgrades to meet regional needs were inevitable, regardless of national network needs. The decision was apparently made to eventually upgrade the Pacific Highway to dual carriageway standard over its entire length, to meet increasing population needs and also to become the primary inter-capital travel and road freight corridor. It looks like this will be achieved after about 30 years since 1990. Upgrades to the New England highway almost completely ceased, and due to travel-time improvements on the Pacific highway, it is apparently no longer the prefered semi-trailer route between Sydney and Brisbane as it used to be in the 1970's and 1980's.

It is my understanding that the National Highway was eventually brought into concordance with the reality on the ground, and the Pacific Highway between Newcastle and Brisbane was included. Was the New England highway excluded ? Or are both included now ? Perhaps we need an up-to-date map which shows this.Eregli bob (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OR doesn't belong in the article, we need factual reliable and verifiable sources supporting the text/content. Bidgee (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quite so. That is what I am researching. The current map is very out of date. This article has been flagged since 2009 as being inadequately referenced. Since it is no longer called the National Highway, perhaps the title is no longer suitable.Eregli bob (talk) 03:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Highway (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140212165939/http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Audit%20Reports/2000%2001/2000_01_audit_report_21.pdf to http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Audit%20Reports/2000%2001/2000_01_audit_report_21.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Territory

Hi, NT abandoned the shield system. The NT section has to be updated. Jordf32123 (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]