Jump to content

Talk:National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Main block of NIFTEM
Main block of NIFTEM
  • ... that National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM) (main block pictured) was announced in 2006 but only inaugurated in 2012? Source: For announcement in 2006: "Budget '06: Full text". The Economic Times. 28 February 2006. Retrieved 13 January 2020. For inauguration in 2012: Siwach, Sukhbir (20 December 2012). "2012: A story of Haryana's achievements". The Times of India. Retrieved 13 January 2020.

Moved to mainspace by Muhandes (talk) and 58.182.172.95 (talk). Nominated by Muhandes (talk) at 13:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new (moved to mainspace on Jan 13 2020). Hook is OK & appropriate length, but maybe consider adding "located in India" after the name? Copyvio check suggests violation unlikely. Sources support hook. Sources in article also look OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuakerSquirrel (talkcontribs) 17:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: How about ALT1 above? --Muhandes (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Muhandes: Honestly? If that's the best you can come up with, it will have to do, though I daresay it won't get many clicks. If only you could add some interesting stories to the article, like student exhibits or awards, you could come up with a more colorful hook. Yoninah (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yoninah: How about ALT2? I am having problems getting sources on the actual volume of distribution (1300 tonne per year? per month?) so I rather not use a number, but it is a large volume. If this does not work and ALT3 is not hooky enough, then I'm afraid we will have to use ALT1, I can't find much secondary sources about the institute. --Muhandes (talk) 15:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you, ALT2 is excellent. Since the image is not of great quality at thumbnail size, I've removed the "(pictured)", and I also shorted ALT2 by removing the acronym. ALT2 hook ref verified and cited inline. Rest of review per QuakerSquirrel. ALT2 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]