Talk:National identity cards in China
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of National identity cards in China was copied or moved into National identity cards in China (disambiguation) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Please have a look at WP:EW. Your habit of reverting people without giving any explanation, when you already know your edits are disputed (see [1], [2], [3]), is generally considered edit-warring behavior. rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- And here you've done it again. Do you not read?
- Here is the issue. Pinyin, simplified characters, and traditional characters are just different names for the same thing, and yet you are listing them on separate lines as if they are different things. On that same page you are not listing Macau's "Macau Special Administrative Region Resident Identity Card" and "Bilhete de Identidade de Residente" on different lines, so why are you doing it for this one? rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Still it's nice to see all isn't it? Only so one can compare. And the one who started EW is YOU. I just created the article and am working on it. Nice if you help. But go away if you look for trouble. TruckCard (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you don't want to list both simplified and traditional character names for a card, then don't; you haven't done it for the other cards (except for Macau; I don't see why you insist on treating that one differently than the others). But, for reasons I explained above, listing the PRC card across three lines is just wrong. rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Still it's nice to see all isn't it? Only so one can compare. And the one who started EW is YOU. I just created the article and am working on it. Nice if you help. But go away if you look for trouble. TruckCard (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Regarding this: a page listing links to multiple related articles that a person might be searching for is a dab page. Don't try to act like it's not; it's clear that you're just mad that your move was contested and now you're trying to create your own article at that title. rʨanaɢ (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
It's not a dab page, it gives an overview. TruckCard (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)