Talk:Neroli
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
External Links
[edit]One link deleted as to a commercial website that adds nothing of value. The one remaining link is not to the BPC, but to a commercial site that duplicates its content. Left for the time being... Cjsunbird (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Use
[edit]I'm inclined to adjust some of the use information because the statement that it is a non-irritant is debatable based on neroli oil containing linalool as a primary constituent, and linalool is considered an allergen under EU guidelines. Personally, I don't feel the linalool should be considered an irritant and I find the methodology that created the EU allergen list incredibly flawed, but it's debatable in my mind. What about just saying that is is Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the FDA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wh1teChocolatte (talk • contribs) 17:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neroli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410064941/http://www.colawp.com/colas/400/cola467_recipe.html to http://www.colawp.com/colas/400/cola467_recipe.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)