Jump to content

Talk:New Ishigaki Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Painushima

[edit]

The following fragment, added by Prburley (talk · contribs), was removed from the article:

"painu" meaning "southern" in the [[Okinawan language]].<ref name="yogo" /><ref name="pref" />

I am pretty sure that pai is not Okinawan. The word in question is hae (南風) in Standard Japanese, where it means "south wind," hwee in the Shuri-Naha dialect[1] and pee in the Nakijin dialect[2]. In Yaeyama, its corresponding forms are paï in the Ishigaki and Kohama dialects, pai in Kuroshima and Sonai, Hatoma, and pëë in Hateruma. And a slightly more accurate transcription of the nickname in the Ishigaki dialect would be paï nu sïma.

I have checked the two cited sources. The first one is dead, and I cannot find corresponding statemens in the second one. I tried to replace them with an official explanation, but I failed to find it. --Nanshu (talk) 12:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are just really splitting at hairs. Obviously, in some Ryukyuan language "Pai" means "south", and that's what they're using for the airport. It's the name that they use for themselves. Just find the proper dialect and give it as the language mentioned.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the article is wrong in describing Painushima as a "colloquial" name, it's quite obviously an attempt at branding. Amended accordingly. Jpatokal (talk) 10:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But "paï nu sïma" is a manufactured romanization scheme by Nanshu. He is known for making up these transcriptions, as he did at Kamuiyaki with his "Kamïyaki" instead of "Kamwiyaki". Ï is used nowhere in linguistics (at least nowhere in the International Phonetic Alphabet), and particularly not within the realm of the Japonic languages.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hopeless. How can Ryulong have the nerve to meddle in linguistic topics without knowing linguistics at all? Considering his anti-intellectual attitude, combined with 100-pages-per-day edits, I cannot imagine how tremendous damage he has done to Wikipedia.
First of all, he must learn the difference between phonology and phonetics. That's a minimum requirement to join the discussion. Everyone in the field knows the distinction.
Showing that Ryulong's accusation against me is groundless is as easy as pie. Just check John R. Bentley's A Linguistic History of the Forgotten Islands (2008) for example. You can find the spellings I used above.
The real problem is that the book is a serious linguistic work. If Ryulong reads it without even knowing the distinction between phonology and phonetics, he will taint Wikipedia with another bunch of errors. --Nanshu (talk) 11:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We have sources that show it's written as "Painushima" and you have nothing other than your claimed expertise in these dying languages and vague claims of sources that says it should be "paï nu sïma". This is an article about an airport much like kamuiyaki is an article on pottery. It does not require extensive linguistic explanations of these endangered languages that you have been posting.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Ishigaki Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]