Talk:New Jersey Route 158

New Jersey Route 158 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
November 1, 2013	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / New Jersey Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New Jersey
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey: Hudson County Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hudson County Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Spelling

It seems strange that a bridge in the United States would use the British/Canadian spelling. Can anyone confirm that the spelling is correct? --Jrsnbarn 18:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most old maps, back to 1853, show the street as Centre Street: [1] This spelling is also used in newspaper articles: [2] --NE2 20:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taft Place / NJ Railroad Ave

Taft Place and NJ Railroad Ave. are 2 separate streets in town. NJRR Ave has been in existence for a long time, Taft Place came to be in the late 1970's/early 1980's and these 2 streets parallel one another.

Taft Place named for William Taft (councilman, Board of Education, Teacher)

NJ Railroad Ave, is named for railroad that runs along side it

If any further info is needed please let me know.

--Witchzilla 16:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

I agree that the article should be moved back to the bridge article. Seeing as there isn't a discussion, I'll start one up. If the article is to stay where it is, shouldn't there be a section on its history as a route, instead of two sections on bridges? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From the start, I felt that the article should have remained at the bridge title. In the GA review, I had requested that it be moved back to the original title, as I thought the information about the Centre Street Bridge as a railroad bridge had nothing to do with Route 158, making "New Jersey Route 158" an inappropriate title. The article can have three sections: one describing the history as a railroad bridge, one descrbing the history of the road bridge, and one describing the history of the route number. {{infobox bridge}}, describing all the historical information about the bridge and including a picture, should be used in place of {{infobox road}} describing Route 158 and a Route 158 shield can be added to the history of the route number sectiion along with the Route 25AD shield. In addition, the browse for Route 158 can be moved to the bottom of the page and {{Crossings navbox}} can be used to show what bridge is upstream and what bridge is downstream. Dough4872 (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 158/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Quite a few self-published sources.
A map would be nice.

I will hold this for the standard 7 days. --Rs chen 7754 04:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As noted to reviewer on IRC, axed two of them, having problems replacing the last. Also, someone else will have to do the map. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 05:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps that sentence should be commented out? --Rs chen 7754 03:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commented out and closing review. --Rs chen 7754 05:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 158. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031111034/http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif to http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Railroad abandonment

When does the Pennsylvania Railroad/Penn Central abandon rail service over the bridge? I think it has to be before 1976; the USRA final system plan gives the "Center Street Branch" a length of 1 mile, between "Harrison" and "HarrisonFrtSta" (presumably Harrison freight station). Mackensen (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality and scope

I've been working on a parallel topic with some overlap: User:Mackensen/Center Street Branch. In the course of doing this I've referred to the sources cited in this article, and I can't verify some of the claims here, especially anything to do with the subsequent usage of the upper deck as a road bridge. That's especially concerning given the current article title. Mackensen (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitchazenia: Any thoughts? --Rs chen 7754 17:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm not doubting that any of this is true, I'm just saying that I can't verify it. Mackensen (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few things that I've questioned over the years on this subject, particularly to the existence of NJ 158. NJ 25AD definitely existed. 158 seems to be up in the air. I can do more research on Monday, but there's a good chance this entire article might have to go poof. NJ 25AD isnt enough on its own to exist and would just be part of the NJ 25 article. Mitch32^{(won't you be my neighbor?)} 00:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]