Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 164

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 164 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 164/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Something that did come up in my mind when I did this was that there is no current infromation. The newly updated NYSDOT site could have some project listed for NY 164. The lead could also use a bit more detail (the termini aren't even listed in that).
    B. Focused:
    Please cut the mention of original 164, not relevant to the current one.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    See below
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    I won't affect the GAN for it, but a picture would be useful. If there's any free ones it would be very helpful to the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This article has some work to do it seems, but it should be easy to fix. Good luck!Mitch32contribs 10:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review (finally!). I just checked, and NYSDOT has zilch on this route. Other issues have been fixed. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Ears

[edit]

This article is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates, with a view to nominating it as a Featured Article. Fasach Nua (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I used that as an example of a short yet comprehensive article. I have no intention of nominating this. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I dont see why not, if it meets the criteria.... Fasach Nua (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather not nominate it, but feel free. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I've found some early history information that I'll add eventually, so it's not completely comprehensive right now. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]