Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 28B

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 28B has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starNew York State Route 28B is part of the New York State Route 28 series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 15, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 28B/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grondemar 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This short but sweet article meets all of the requirements to become a Good Article, except for a couple of issues I note below:

  • In the Route description, when talking about development along the route, it's unclear whether the past tense means that this was the state of development at the time of the existence of NY-28B, or whether this is the modern state of development along the former path of the route. Could you clarify?
  • On a similar note, did the divided highway for NY-12/NY-28 exist when NY-28B did?
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article is placed on hold pending resolution of the above concern.

Thank you. Grondemar 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With my concerns satisfied, I am passing this article as a good article. Congratulations! Grondemar 01:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]