Talk:Nicholas Wiseman

}}

Fair use rationale for Image:CardinalWisemanlogo.gif

Image:CardinalWisemanlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

.................................................................

WHY?

Why do you consider this is a "Fair use rationale" of an image of a person who died in 1865, of which the image that has been inserted in the article is an engravure dated from 1916? I don't know about the matter, but there the image has 95 years. Has the image Copyright? Has the Copyright been violated? Has the image Copyright, even after 95 years since the image was created? Should the person who put in Wikipedia's article ask permission to put the image? -Permission, I say, to the descendents of the author of the image-. Or is the image of the public dominion, and therefore it doesn't need to ask permission for its use. There should of the public dominion after 95 years the image was created. I'm not an expert on this subject, so I have doubts about what I've juste exposed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.181.135 (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC) ..............

I am the author of the last unsigned commentary: Llera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llera (talk • contribs) 15:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)