Jump to content

Talk:Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updating Info to Reflect Current Reports

[edit]

Past edits did not include reference to this nonprofit organization's annual tax filings. Documents such as IRS Form 990s, which all U.S.-based nonprofits with receipts exceeding $25,000 per year are required by law to file, provide pertinent information about the operations of a nonprofit organizations based in the United States. Additionally, no information was previously provided about the individuals listed as officers/trustees of this organization, or the organization's payments to these individuals. Furthermore, individuals listed as Senior Investigators in previous edits are no longer listed as current affiliates on this organization’s website. The edits made by this contributor have been made to provide a more current and in-depth account of this organization using credible sources and publically available documents compiled by reputable organizations for which Wikipedia provides articles about.

Welcome to wikipedia. As was communicated earlier, wp has policies -- especially stringent in the areas of BLPs -- relating to what wp refers to as "original research" and "synthesis", and also relating to the use of primary sources. It is these policies that were at issue with regard to the recent additions that have been reverted.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Recent edits on this point have apparently come from a sockpuppet/master tandem, as reflected here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Natsecobserver.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial coverage

[edit]

This article is full of passing mentions: one- and two-sentence morsels in articles about something else entirely. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added even more cites--the ones on the page already (and others that a wp:before review would turn up) amply reflect its notability IMHO.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid referecens

[edit]

Most of the "references" linked have nothing to do with this organisation. This article is a forgery as it is today. --Damiens.rf 12:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've read all the references, and I'm not sure how you reach that conclusion. Might you be able to provide more specific comments, and I'll re-examine them? Also, I'm unclear as to what precisely you are suggesting has been "forged". Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Folded

[edit]

The organization seems to have folded sometime in 2013. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]