Talk:Occupy Ottawa

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OWS (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject OWS, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OWSWikipedia:WikiProject OWSTemplate:WikiProject OWSOWS articles

Sections and headings

The headings and organization of this article could be amended to make it much easier for people to read.Questionable pulse (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content

This article is sort of a disaster. It seems as though most edits have been blatantly partisan in one direction or another. Have already cleared out the 'controversies' section since it was incoherent, missing citations and had a heading with no accompanying text. I am thinking of taking a metaphorical axe to large unsourced, non-NPOV parts of the article. Badly in need of attention.

Section on controversies needs to be rewritten: reporting in the case of the needle drop was no more than usually biased and can be sourced relatively easily. The Revolutionary Communist Party controversy, on the other hand, will be more difficult. The press coverage of the events in question were reproduced wholesale from an internet posting made by the Revolutionary Communist Party and were therefore riddled with unproven allegations and factual errors. The event was an important moment in the history of the camp regardless of partisan perspective in any direction, and deserves to be recorded. I am not sufficiently familiar with sourcing guidelines to do so myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.162.185.62 (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rtnews template

I've removed the Russia Today news template from the page, as it had raised concern because it pointed to a single trending news page, rather than a selection of trend pages, and after discussion in the appropriate places, it's easier to remove it than it is to add lots of other trend pages, as I don't know of any (don't have time to look). If there are any comments, concerns, or suggestions please reply on my talkpage, as I don't watch this page. Penyulap ☏ 05:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Occupy Ottawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120310051701/http://www.occupyottawa.org/calendar to http://www.occupyottawa.org/calendar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]