Talk:Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catholicism Low‑importance

Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

St Boniface

I think it's pretty preposterous to claim the great catholic medieval saint St Boniface as a mamber of this heretic sect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wefa (talk • contribs) 17:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Saints and Popes member of this Schismatic Sect?

No popes, far less Saints, were members of the schismatic and heretical sect which denies Papal Infallibility. All the Popes and Saints mentioned believed in it.

I removed the list with "famous members" as it was made up and was nonsense. Medieval Roman Catholics were no members of this separated community, as it did not exist yet back then. Only the Roman Catholic See of Utrecht existed. Like now. The Old Catholic See of Utrecht can't claim it was the original Roman Catholic See. Two beliefs two Sees.

82.72.242.204 21:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of bishops

Relevant discussion at

→ Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht#Lists of bishops
→ Talk:Bishopric of Utrecht#Lists of bishops
→ Talk:Old Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht#Lists of bishops

I think that this article, as well as the related articles found in the relevant discussion box above, can be improved by:

moving all the lists of Old Catholic archbishops into either Old Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht or a separate List of Old Catholic archbishops of Utrecht, as is done in the corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia

Please comment in Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht#Lists of bishops to centralize the discussion. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC); modified 20:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Catholic Church and ecumenism#Diocese of Utrecht in 1703

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Catholic Church and ecumenism#Diocese of Utrecht in 1703. The historic Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht (695–1580) was canonically suppressed during the Protestant Reformation because of persecution. After it was suppressed, its territory became part of a missionary administrative structure in the Low Countries, the Vicariate Apostolic of Batavia, erected in 1592. There was no "Diocese of Utrecht" that left the Catholic Church after 1703. Thanks. BoBoMisiu (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects at RfD

"Ancient Catholic Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient Catholic Church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ancient Catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient Catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ancient catholic church" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient catholic church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient catholic church until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ancient catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient catholic until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Ancient Catholic Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Ancient Catholic Church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#The Ancient Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ultrajectine" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ultrajectine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2 § Ultrajectine until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]